The Archaic Battle: Love vs Hate

Islamists has Hate as their fundamental force.

What is most valuble to protect from Islamists is Love.

One can formulate the war between Islamists and the rest of the world as a war between Hate and Love. It is interesting: What will win? What will prevail. Love or Hate? Will Love defeat Hate? Good and smart people take strength from the identification that when you fight Islamists you fight for Love.

This is the classic battle in many movies: Like Star Wars, when Darth Wader is Hate and the Rebells are Love.

Islamists are driven by Hate, and non-Muslims and moderate Muslims are driven by Love.

Some Basic Knowledge

What is a moderate Muslim? The link refers to a Daniel Pipes resource.

proselytize =
1 : to induce someone to convert to one's faith
2 : to recruit someone to join one's party, institution, or cause

Three Basic Ways To Marginalize Sharia Law

The risk for Sharia Law governing a country is minimized when:

• There are as few Muslims living in the country as possible (a minority of all Muslims supports Sharia law though, according to Daniel Pipes).
• Among the Muslims living in the country as few of them as possible support Sharia Law (Three ways of supporting it is to vote for Sharia law to be implemented to the country, to attract new supporters for Sharia Law and to accept informal Sharia courts.)
• Possibly changing the Constitutions of countries (the Constitution part of the Law system) to minimize the risk of Sharia being formally implemented.

An important reform if implementing the first point is to stop immigration of Muslims and if refugees are welcomed into the country, only non-Muslims should are received.

Protecting From Harassing Lawsuits - And To Harass Back

There are some important structures needed to successfully fight for Civilization (that is to fight Islamic law and violent Muslims).

Of absolut necessity is a structure for protecting free speech regarding Islam and Isamists.

How is free speach best protected?

Harassing lawsuits are lawsuits with no chance of winning and are only intended to disturb and scare. These exists (they are reported on the web resources of Daniel Pipes).

This awful reality should be adressed and dealt with by publishers. The purpose is to not be decouraged to publish material.
An optimal organizational structure for a publisher to deal with this is probably is to have established routines for handling law-suits. Also the publisher need to have the financial resources to handle law-suits. Organizations specializing in providing expertise and financing to publishers would be strategically very important - it could be engaged by publishers early in the process of deciding on publishing a text.

If or when or how to retaliate should be adressed by individuals and organizations interested in counter-Sharia and counter-Jihad.

These ideas are perhaps adaptable to the academic arena.