Green Zone Book and Academic Paper Publishing

There is a huge threat to civilization with the problem of books not being published because of threats of violence (An example). The withdrawn books is a both a victory for barbarians attacking free and a defeat for 'civilizationists' because the content of the specific books are not spread to the public.

One solution is anonymity for selected employees and authors. The anonymity for employees are best upheld by not having a common physical working location (or if practically possible a secret one). The employees may work on-line, on secure lines.

The anonymous publishing house may have to have some public front representatives. The safety of these should be maintained optimally.

This kind of publishing houses should seek media publicity about their radical organizational structure and it may get it. To market it to the public and important interests are vital, of course.

This may be adaptable to Academic Papers as well.

Most Important Status: Free Speech on the Internet

On of the most important strategic goals of the counter-Sharia and counter-Jihad movement should be to protect free speech on the Internet.

The goal should be that the highest standards of free speech (I suggest the standards in the United States of America) should be the real standards in all Western and all other countries. There need to be, if possible, Internet support structures for realizing this that transcend national borders.

It is of strategic importance to create such structures if only for the purpose of creating this vital strategic counter-Sharia and counter-Jihad tool. It is also important to market these structures and the freedom of speech that they hold.

The Corporate Profitability of Counter-Sharia and Counter-Jihad Investments

If capital markets and consumers are somewhat depressed about Muslim terrorists and increasing risk of Sharia and Jihad, then it may be profitable for companies and wealthy persons and organizations to invest in counter-Sharia and counter-Jihad organizations, just like investments in research and development (R&D) are vital on a long-term basis for companies.

It is important to enlighten companies and wealthy individuals and organizations about this investment opportunity and to provide them with attractive counter-Sharia and counter-Jihad programs.

Of course, an increased inflow of resources would be important for the counter-Sharia and counter-Jihad movement.

A Great Weapon: Rape - Religion Statistics

A great weapon to rally support to fight Sharia is to use facts about the religious and cultural profile of rapists. The instinct for women to not be raped and for men to protect women from being raped is fundamental and strong. To inform the public about the true statistical facts about the background of groups in society that has been over represented about committing rape is therefore probably a most effective tool. Why? Because there are indications that in Sweden men with foreign background are more likely to rape women than other men (indications like in this DN article and some links in this source). The sought after result of spreading this information is a stop of accepting refugees and immigrants that are Muslims (because the more Muslims in a country, the higher risk of support of Sharia). Those candidates for political posts and the political parties that want to stop Muslim refugees and immigrants may be called all-important catchy slogans like "The anti-rape party (candidate)", which may be used in something like this "I vote for an anti-rape party" or "vote for us, your anti-rape party!"

This is what perhaps should be done: Individuals and group interested in preventing rape and Sharia systematically and on an ongoing basis examine verdicts from courts. The guilty person's religion and origin are then checked up. These facts are then summarized. And the results are spread to the public. If media is not interested in preventing rape then notes may be put up on walls on public areas and friends and families may be informed about the threats to women.
It would be interesting to know about the victim's description of the rapist(s) in those cases where no arrests were made; what language did they speak? These data could be summarized as well.

Freedoms Vs Freedoms

Being sick is a negative thing. Sometimes the effort, cost and pain of taking a preventing shot at a medical clinic might be a rational investment.

How about living in a country with Sharia law? What freedom and rights does not exist there, that exist in a non-Sharia country? There are many. Equal rights for women about inheritance, punishment for adultery, choice of clothing. Non-Muslim extra tax is a discrimination of non-Muslims. The list is probably longer. For more information, study Daniel Pipes website.

Is there a shot in the arm that might prevent this. Are there freedoms and rights in the non-Sharia country that may be taken away in a way that prevent Sharia from replacing the existing laws? Which of these rights and freedoms would be worth taking away? Are dictatorships, like China, able to supress Islamization? Would you prefer living in a Sharia-free China or a Sharia-ruled Western country?

There is a policy that more or less take away the risk of Sharia without breaking any rights or freedoms. That is to reject immigrants and refugees that are Muslim, on one hand, and on the other hand taking in non-Muslim refugees and immigrants at a rate that prevents the rate of Muslims in the country from increasing. One disadvantage with this method is that moderate Muslims that are escaping Sharia from Sharia-ruled countries are declined help, which would be heart-aching to do.

The rational person strives for a future and use means to do this that are optimal.

Islamists Are Perhaps Acting Out From a Wish For Survival

The world-wide spread of capitalism in the last century and this one threatened Sharia-ruled countries. Islamists had to attack capitalism or perish.

A lot of persons like capitalism because it helps them consume and invest in more services and goods. Consumption is a source of comfort, as is a religious belief. Capitalism therefore diminishes the need for using religion as a comfort. Because people like comfort it is natural in a free world for capitalism to spread like the rays of the sun at the break of a new day.

Capitalism started in the 19:th century (?).

It can be regarded that islamists has started its new aggressive aim for worldwide domination (after centuries of being passive they began aggressive once againg in the 20:th century?) as the only way of survival for Sharia. If the islamists hadn´t started this latest aggressive approach then capitalism might have swept across the earth and brought modernisation, civilization, democracy and material wealth to all of its corners: this would not have been a climate for Sharia to reign anywhere.

If this is true, then this time Islamists act out of a wish for survival.

A Negative View of Capitalism Is Helping Islamists

Many westerners bear an undeserved guilt about acting in a capitalist system. This guilt is helping Islam to spread in the West.

The guilt comes from the view that capitalism is making West rich on poor contries behalf. Westerners who feels this hold thoose cultures that is not identified as pro-capitalistic as morally superior about the economic aspect than the capitalist supporting cultures. Non-Muslim Westerners are probably identifying Islam as less pro-capitalistic than whatever belief or cultural system they themselves hold*. If this is true then the non-Muslim Westerners that hold this negative view of capitalism tends to regard Muslims as morally superior about views on economics. A person who in any aspect regards another person as morally superior is "one down" on the other person, which can be expoited by the person that is one-up. A large part of Westerners belief about capitalism therefore benefit Islamists.

Fortunately for truth-speaking persons this view on capitalism is factually wrong**. There are more support for the view that capitalism is a win-win method, with no loosers, that capitalism is a system of mutual growth and not one of trying to grab as much as possible from a constant set of valubales.

If this is true then one way of fighting Islamism is to make people and oneself regard capitalism more accurately and positively.

* Because there are fewer Muslims in "more capitalistic" Western work market positions such as in the financial sector and in management for Western businesses, because of the non-interest aspect of Sharia, and because Westerners mentally connect Muslims to the Middle East, the Middle East generally regarded as less capitalistic than the west, and perhaps because the targets on Nine-Eleven was symbols of capitalism.
** Because they can act to spread the positive view on capitalism without being untruthful.