A great weapon to rally support to fight Sharia is to use facts about the religious and cultural profile of rapists. The instinct for women to not be raped and for men to protect women from being raped is fundamental and strong. To inform the public about the true statistical facts about the background of groups in society that has been over represented about committing rape is therefore probably a most effective tool. Why? Because there are indications that in Sweden men with foreign background are more likely to rape women than other men (indications like in this DN article and some links in this source). The sought after result of spreading this information is a stop of accepting refugees and immigrants that are Muslims (because the more Muslims in a country, the higher risk of support of Sharia). Those candidates for political posts and the political parties that want to stop Muslim refugees and immigrants may be called all-important catchy slogans like "The anti-rape party (candidate)", which may be used in something like this "I vote for an anti-rape party" or "vote for us, your anti-rape party!"
This is what perhaps should be done: Individuals and group interested in preventing rape and Sharia systematically and on an ongoing basis examine verdicts from courts. The guilty person's religion and origin are then checked up. These facts are then summarized. And the results are spread to the public. If media is not interested in preventing rape then notes may be put up on walls on public areas and friends and families may be informed about the threats to women.
It would be interesting to know about the victim's description of the rapist(s) in those cases where no arrests were made; what language did they speak? These data could be summarized as well.
